I visited the site mentioned below in the comments (and above in the title of this post). Thank you for the comment.
The website looks nice. It navigates cleanly. The images clearly describe the architecture and surroundings. There is not much mentioned about the greenness of the architecture. The only "green" information is in reference to the preservation of a particular species of tree. While preserving old trees on a site is commendable, a developer can describe other things they do as well.
What other amenities are available to residents?
Is the stone on the houses from a local quarry?
Will the residents have higher or lower utility bills compared to the national average?
How are storm drainage issues handled?
Thursday, July 31, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Architectural Projects
- 2013-2017 NASA Fuel Farm ~$4m
- 2016-2017 Yuma Range Towers
- 2015-2017 SBIAA Hangar 763 improvements ~ $3.5m
- 2016-2017 Beale AFB Building B1210/B1214 2nd floor ~2.2m
- 2015-2016 VBA Wilshire 2nd floor, GSA ~$4m
